William Bracy and Roger Collins v. James Schomig and Roger Cowan
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
286 F.3d 406
William BRACY and Roger Collins, Petitioners-Appellants, Cross-Appellees,
v.
James SCHOMIG and Roger Cowan, Respondents-Appellees, Cross-Appellants.
No. 99-4318.
No. 99-4319.
No. 99-4320.
No. 99-4345.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Argued September 21, 2001.
Decided March 29, 2002.
John L. Stainthorp, People's Law Office, Chicago, IL, Gilbert H. Levy (argued), Seattle, WA, for petitioner-appellee, William Bracy.
William L. Browers (argued), Office of Attorney General, Chicago, IL, for respondents-appellants, James M. Schomig, and Jonathan R. Walls.
Robert H. Farley, Jr.,…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Posner; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Rovner.
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Warden, Schomig v. BracySupreme Court of the United States · 2002