Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Kupfer

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1933No. Docket No. 681PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

On August 11, 1928, the defendant conveyed to the plaintiff certain lots in Newport Beach, according to the recorded map or plat thereof. Thereafter, the plaintiff brought this action to quiet title to a tract of land lying between the lots as described in the deed and the line of ordinary high tide of the Pacific Ocean in Newport Bay. In her answer the defendant alleged that she was the owner of this additional land and asked that her title thereto be quieted. The court found in favor of the defendant and from a judgment quieting her title the plaintiff has appealed.

The appellant introduced…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fowler v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Strand Improvement Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Freeman v. BellegardeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. McDermott v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Orendorff v. SteeleNew York Supreme Court · 1848

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State of California v. Superior Court (Lyon)California Supreme Court · 1981
  2. North Shore, Inc. v. WakefieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Jennings v. ShippNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  4. In Re the Estate of RosenbaumSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Deering Ex Rel. Volts v. GahmSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API