Michael E. MENNOR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. the FORT HOOD NATIONAL BANK, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Circuit Judge:
The defendant Fort Hood National Bank appeals from an adverse judgment in this Title VII case. The plaintiff Michael E. *554Mennor filed his charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission within the 300-day filing period of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e). The 300-day filing period is available for cases in which state or local agency proceedings have been instituted. This appeal principally presents the question whether this 300-day period applies whether or not these other proceedings are timely instituted under state or local law. We hold that the 300-day filing period…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mohasco Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Love v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Commercial Office Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Mota v. University of Texas Houston Health Science CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Sheila Ann Glenn, Patricia F. Johns, and Robbie Nugent v. General Motors Corporation, Saginaw Steering Gear DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Leroy GRIFFIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DALLAS, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Calvin Rhodes v. Guiberson Oil Tools Division A/K/A F I E, A/K/A Division Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.