Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Miller v. New Womyn, Inc.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided May 12, 2004No. 02-1049PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARSON, Justice.
The State of Iowa, through its attorney general, brought an action under our Consumer Fraud Statute, Iowa Code § 714.16 (1999), against New Womyn, Inc. and its president, Dan Kaiser, based on the defendants’ promotion and sale of a breast-enlargement device called a “Stimulation VII.” Acting on a complaint filed by a New Womyn customer, the attorney general unsuccessfully sought information from the defendants about their product. The attorney general ultimately applied for, and the court granted, a default against the defendants for their failure to comply with discovery…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Corbin v. PickrellArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Rio Grande Oil Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Brown v. Market Development, Inc., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Statee ex rel. Miller v. Cutty's Des Moines Camping Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Alan Brown v. Louisiana-Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Billy Dean Carter, Bill G. Carter, and the Estate of Shirley D. Carter, by and through Bill G. Carter v. Jason CarterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2021
- City of Ottumwa v. Larry D. ClabaughCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2020
- Shahnaz Lotfipour and Khosrow Lotfipour v. Pr Partylines, LLCCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.