Legal Opinion
Boxer v. Gottlieb
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 15, 1987No. 83 Civ. 3375 (MGC)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
Defendants Renault U.S.A., Inc. (“Renault U.S.A.”) and Renault Service Ventes Speciales Exportation (“Renault S.V.S.E.”) have moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The motions are opposed by plaintiff Karen Boxer (“Boxer”) and defendant Manuel Gottlieb (“Gottlieb”). The issue on these motions is whether the New York “guest motorist” statute, Section 388 of the New York Vehicle and Traffic Law, applies to an automobile accident in France caused by the negligence of the driver of an automobile that was rented only for delivery, use and operation…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of NigeriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Neumeier v. KuehnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Miller v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mattel, Inc. v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Fried v. SeippelNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re: B-727 200Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Rosenberg v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Elson v. DefrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.