Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. Czamanske

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 1993No. WD 46254PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRECKENRIDGE, Judge.

Curtis and Linda Rodgers appeal from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Daniel Czamanske and Scott Orr in a legal malpractice action. The Rodgers raise one point on appeal alleging that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because of the existence of genuine issues of material fact. The judgment is affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded for trial.

This case is the third case arising out of the same factual circumstances. In both Rodgers v. Acuncius, 736 S.W.2d 424 (Mo.App.1987), and Acuncius v. Yeaman, 758 S.W.2d 73…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Zafft v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. Detling v. EdelbrockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. Sunset Acres Motel, Inc. v. JacobsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  5. McDowell v. SchuetteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Ringstreet Northcrest, Inc. v. BisanzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Daniel v. Indiana Mills & Manufacturing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Reeves v. KeeslerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. M & D ENTERPRISES, INC. v. WolffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Ditto, Incorporated v. Heather Davids, Chris Davids and Revive Lee's Summit, LLC, F/K/A Ditto Lee's SummitMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API