Legal Opinion

Easton Bank v. Coryell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1844PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the Common Pleas of Bucks county. This was an action of assumpsit on a promissory note, brought by the Easton Bank against Coryell and Murray. After the charge of the court, the jury retired to deliberate upon their verdict, and after the lapse of some time came into court. After they had entered the jury-box and nine of them had been called, and before the clerk had finished calling them, the plaintiff asked to suffer a nonsuit.

Read the full summary

ERROR to the Common Pleas of Bucks county. This was an action of assumpsit on a promissory note, brought by the Easton Bank against Coryell and Murray. After the charge of the court, the jury retired to deliberate upon their verdict, and after the lapse of some time came into court. After they had entered the jury-box and nine of them had been called, and before the clerk had finished calling them, the plaintiff asked to suffer a nonsuit. The court decided that it was too late, and refused to allow it, and the plaintiff excepted. This refusal was one of the assignments of error. cited…

1Per curiam

There is no apparent error in the charge; but the plaintiff was erroneously compelled to submit to a verdict, it was ruled in M’Lughan v. Bovard, for reasons not necessarily to be repeated, that a plaintiff is entitled to become nonsuit at any time before the jury have declared their readiness to give their verdict in answer to the prothonotary’s formal inquiry; but in this instance they were not ready, for they had not all been called and counted, in compliance with the ceremony that precedes the question of readiness. It is better to hold fast to the established criterion, whatever it may…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Haviland v. Fidelity Insurance, Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  2. Crumley v. LutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. Donosa v. UeltzenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. David Magen, Builder, Inc. v. Price, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1939
  5. Raymond v. CostallasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API