Donosa v. Ueltzen
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for breach of a contract. The case came on for trial and had proceeded to the taking of evidence upon the part of the defendant when counsel for plaintiff moved the court “to enter a voluntary nonsuit in this case with leave to take it off.”
Our statutory regulations on the subject of voluntary nonsuit are found in the Act of March 28, 1815, 6 Smith Laws 208, which reads: “Whenever, on the trial of any cause, a jury shall be ready to give in their verdict, the plaintiff shall not be called, nor shall he then be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Beaver v. SlaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Consolidated National Bank v. McManusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- M'Lughan v. BovardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835
- Lamb v. GreenhouseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Haviland v. Fidelity Insurance, Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.