Legal Opinion

State v. Morris & Cumings

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1889No. 2495PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Aransas. Tried below before Hon. H. Clay Pleasants.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Chief Justice.—

This cause has twice been before this court, .and its history and leading facts will be found in the former reports of the decisions made. Morris & Cumings v. State, 62 Texas, 729; Id., 65 Texas, 53.

On the last trial the conclusions of law and fact were as follows:

“ 1. That the respondent, the city of Corpus Christi, under charter from the State of Texas, was authorized to open the ship channel which ■connects the waterways of Corpus Christi Bay with those of Aransas Bay, ■and to collect and charge tolls from all vessels passing through said channel, and that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Southern Pacific RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Morris & Cumings v. State ex rel. GuessettTexas Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gainesville Water Co. v. City of GainesvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Gale v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Chouke v. FilipasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Murphy v. LuttrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. New York & Texas Land Co. v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API