Legal Opinion

St. Louis San Francisco R. Co. v. Caldwell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 15, 1919No. 9471PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Choctaw County; C. E. Dudley, Judge. Action by the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company against F. H. Caldwell, County Treasurer, and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The parties hereto will be referred to as plaintiff and defendants as in the trial court.

The excise board of Choctaw county for the year ending June 30, 1916, made a levy for current expenses for the county and other municipalities situated therein, as follows, to wit: Choctaw county, 4.46 mills; Peter, Everidge, Hunter, and Oaks township, 1.7 mills each; Ratliff township, 1.9 mills; city of Hugo, 6.6 mills; and the towns of Boswell and Ft. Towson, 4.4 mills each. The plaintiff paid the taxes, the product of this levy, at 'the same time filing with the defendant a protest, and brought this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Missouri, K. v. Walker, Cty. Treas.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. LeFlore v. Reflections of Tulsa, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. City of Ardmore v. Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. County Treasurer of Tulsa Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Schulte v. Board of County Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API