State v. Rooks
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
*790¶1
Schindler, J.
— Mark Allen Rooks appeals his conviction for murder in the second degree of his ex-girl friend, Amanda Gurr. Rooks argues his constitutional right to be present at a critical stage of the trial was violated when he was excluded from an in-chambers conference to address his attorneys’ motion to withdraw based on a conflict of interest. Rooks also argues the trial court erred in admitting his statements to the police including a 90-minute taped confession because the State failed to establish the corpus delicti of the crime; the prosecutor committed misconduct during jury…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. HummelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Caruso v. WixomCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. RooksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. HendricksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.