Legal Opinion
Robert M. Padden Construction, Inc. v. Reitkopf
New York County Courts
Decided August 16, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Peter G. Dounias, J.
This is an action commenced by plaintiff, Robert M. Padden Construction, Inc., to recover upon an oral contract for home improvement work and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Defen*273dont homeowners, Bernard Reitkopf and Nancy Reitkopf (the Reitkopfs), moved pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7) for an order dismissing the complaint. This court converted defendants’ motion to one for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3211 (c). The relevant facts are as follows:
In June of 1988, the Reitkopfs and plaintiff’s president, Robert M. Padden (Padden), negotiated an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Richards Conditioning Corp. v. OleetNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Millington v. RapoportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Chosen Construction Corp. v. SyzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- George Piersa, Inc. v. RosenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Joseph v. David M. Schwarz/Architectural Services, P.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997