Legal Opinion

Rapaport v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 2, 1915No. Appeals, Nos. 88 and 89PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeals, Nos. 88 and 89, Oct. T., 1914, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., Nov. T., 1911, No. 498, on verdict for P. Rapaport, plaintiff, in case of P. Rapaport and Israel Rapaport, by his next friend and father, P. Rapaport, v. The Pittsburgh Railways Company. Before Fell, C. J., Brown, Potter, Elkin and Moschzisker, JJ. Reversed. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Davis, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts.

Read the full summary

Appeals, Nos. 88 and 89, Oct. T., 1914, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., Nov. T., 1911, No. 498, on verdict for P. Rapaport, plaintiff, in case of P. Rapaport and Israel Rapaport, by his next friend and father, P. Rapaport, v. The Pittsburgh Railways Company. Before Fell, C. J., Brown, Potter, Elkin and Moschzisker, JJ. Reversed. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Davis, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict for P. Rapaport for $2,000 and for Israel Rapaport, a minor, for $2,500 and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed. The…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Moschzisker,

This was an action to recover damages for injuries to *349a minor child. Two verdicts were rendered, one in favor of the child for $2,500, and the other in favor of the parents for $2,000. Judgment was entered on each verdict and two appeals were taken by the defendant; but the first of these was not pressed, and a non-pros was entered. The judgment in favor of the parents is now before us and the question involved may be stated thus: Is a parent guil ty of contributory negligence who sends an unattended child of tender age across a street traversed by a double…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Reading City Passenger RailwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  2. Cramer v. Aluminum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Glassey v. Hestonville, Mantua & Fairmount Passenger Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  4. Smith v. Hestonville, Mantua & Fairmount Passenger Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  5. Westerberg v. Kinzua etc. R., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, McKean County1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dattola Et Ux. v. Burt Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Morningstar v. North East Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Darbrinsky v. Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Pinter v. James Baker, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Watson v. Highland Grove Traction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API