Legal Opinion
Mulvenna v. Sullivan
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 2, 1992No. 91 C 4578PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
John Mulvenna (“Mulvenna”) claims that he was permanently disabled by an acute anterior wall myocardial infarction. 1 Secretary of Health and Human Services Louis Sullivan (“Secretary”) denied Mulvenna’s claim for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i) and 423. 2
Mulvenna has appealed that decision and now moves for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56, seeking reversal or remand. Secretary cross-moves for summary judgment. For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order, both…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- John S. Young v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Robertson v. SaulDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2021
- Seibel v. SaulDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020