Legal Opinion

State v. Minnick

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Union : Robert Eakin, Judge. John Minnick having been acquitted on a charge of larceny, the state appealed, whereupon the defendant filed a motion to dismiss.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton

The defendant was indicted for the crime of larceny, and interposed a plea of former acquittal. The state demurred to the plea, and, the demurrer being overruled, a trial was had, at the close of which the court instructed the jury to return a verdict of not guilty,, and, the defendant having been discharged upon the return of such verdict, the state appealed. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, assigning as a reason therefor that the state has no right of appeal under such conditions, and this presents the sole question for determination.

The statute has prescribed that an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  2. State v. BollingerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  3. State v. RisleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  4. People v. DempseyNew York Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CraigSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. State v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State v. GarrettOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. State v. RamirezSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  5. State v. A 1963 Corvette AutomobileCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API