State v. Minnick
Oregon Supreme Court
From Union : Robert Eakin, Judge. John Minnick having been acquitted on a charge of larceny, the state appealed, whereupon the defendant filed a motion to dismiss.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton
The defendant was indicted for the crime of larceny, and interposed a plea of former acquittal. The state demurred to the plea, and, the demurrer being overruled, a trial was had, at the close of which the court instructed the jury to return a verdict of not guilty,, and, the defendant having been discharged upon the return of such verdict, the state appealed. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, assigning as a reason therefor that the state has no right of appeal under such conditions, and this presents the sole question for determination.
The statute has prescribed that an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. . LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- State v. BollingerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- State v. RisleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
- People v. DempseyNew York Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. CraigSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- State v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. GarrettOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. RamirezSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- State v. A 1963 Corvette AutomobileCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972