Legal Opinion

State v. Foster

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1961PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

This is an appeal by the State of Oregon from a judgment in a criminal case by which the trial court vacated the verdict of guilty and its previous judgment of conviction, and dismissed the indictment.

The defendants, Archie Emil Foster (true name Archie Emil Taggart) and William David Potter, were on 29 September 1960 charged by indictment with the crime of receiving and concealing stolen property, in violation of ORS 165.045. Potter alone was tried, but by stipulation the case is to be considered as if both defendants were tried, since the evidence would be the same as to both defendants.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Huffman v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State v. RosserOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State v. EndsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State v. BurkeOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Holmes v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gairson v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. BockornyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. BaxleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. State v. HaynesOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. State v. A 1963 Corvette AutomobileCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API