State v. Wignall
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Mahaska District Court. — Hon. W. G. Clements, Judge. Deeendant was convicted of illegally transporting intoxicating liquors, and from the judgment imposed appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Deemer, C. J.-
Section 2119 of the Code of 1897, so far as material, reads as follows:
If any express or railway company, or any common carrier, or person, or any one as the agent or employee therefore, shall transport or convey to any. person within this state any intoxicating liquors, without first having been furnished with a certificate from the clerk of the *652court issuing the permit, showing that the consignee is a permit holder and authorized to sell liquors in the county to which the shipment is made, such company, common carrier, person, agent or employee thereof, shall upon conviction,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Oakland v. Oakland Water Front Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. SmileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- McBride v. Des Moines City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- City of Burlington v. LeebrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Brown v. J. H. Bell Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- State v. SchultzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- State v. BishopSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
- Ex Parte FurtonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.