State v. Bishop
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
— The question presented is whether thé mótor truck driven by defendant, adapted for and lised solely in delivering and - applying, anhydrotis ammonia and liquid fertilizer, is an implement of husbandry as defined in seetipn 321.1, paragraph Í6. (All references are to the'Code of Iowa, 1962, unless otherwise, stated.), , .
Defendant was convicted of driving, an unregistered motor truck upon the highway in viqlation of section 321.17. He contended in the .trial-court -and urges here he comes within, the exception in section 321:18, subparagraph 3, excepting “any implement of husbandry.” No…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fabricius v. Montgomery Elevator CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- Wood Bros. Thresher v. EicherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Bergeson v. PeschSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Rohlf v. KasemeierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- State v. WignallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Graham v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Thomas v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- Schmitt v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Kalmbach, Inc. v. The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Harnack v. District Court of Woodbury CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.