Legal Opinion

State v. Bishop

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 12, 1965No. 51446PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

— The question presented is whether thé mótor truck driven by defendant, adapted for and lised solely in delivering and - applying, anhydrotis ammonia and liquid fertilizer, is an implement of husbandry as defined in seetipn 321.1, paragraph Í6. (All references are to the'Code of Iowa, 1962, unless otherwise, stated.), , .

Defendant was convicted of driving, an unregistered motor truck upon the highway in viqlation of section 321.17. He contended in the .trial-court -and urges here he comes within, the exception in section 321:18, subparagraph 3, excepting “any implement of husbandry.” No…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fabricius v. Montgomery Elevator CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  2. Wood Bros. Thresher v. EicherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  3. Bergeson v. PeschSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  4. Rohlf v. KasemeierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. State v. WignallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Graham v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  2. Thomas v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  3. Schmitt v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  4. Kalmbach, Inc. v. The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. Harnack v. District Court of Woodbury CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1970

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API