Legal Opinion

United States v. Joseph M. Margiotta

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 10, 1981No. 1279, Docket 81-1084PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge:

This interlocutory appeal from an order in a criminal case presents the issue of whether an indictment charging mail fraud is impermissibly duplicitous because it alleges numerous mailings in a single count. The District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Charles P. Sifton, Judge) ordered the Government to select in advance of trial one mailing on which the mail fraud count could go to the jury. From that order, the Government appealed. Because of the imminence of the scheduled trial, we announced our decision at the conclusion of oral argument, reversing the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. United States v. Dale Murray, Paul Leahey, Ronald Vanderbosch, Lawrence Tower, and Linton SherlockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. United States v. Joseph M. MargiottaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. SchleiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Joe S. Duncan and Michael M. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. TutinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API