Legal Opinion
Traphagen v. Township of West Hoboken
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 15, 1877PublishedCited by 11 opinions
On certiorari. In matter of widening Palisade avenue.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Van Syckel, J.
The purpose of this wx-it is to review the assessment made upon the lands of the prosecutors, in the improvement of Palisade avenue.
The defendants, admitting that the report of the commissioners fails to certify such facts as are essential, under the *233adjudicated cases, to validate their proceedings, rely upon a provision contained in the eighth section of the act under which the improvement was projected, [Laws, 1871, p. 1029, § 8,) “ that no certiorari shall be allowed or granted to set aside such assessment after thirty days shall have…
2Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Application of LiVolsiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Lehigh Valley R. Co. of New Jersey v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- State v. Court of Common PleasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
- Dorrance v. MartinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1935
- Bd. of Ed. of Fort Lee v. Mayor, Etc., of Fort LeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.