Legal Opinion

Levandoski v. Cone

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 24, 2004No. SC 16843PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BORDEN, J.

The common-law “firefighter’s rule” provides, in general terms, that a firefighter or police officer who enters private property in the exercise of his duties occupies the status of a licensee and, therefore, is owed *654a duty of care by the property owner that is less than that owed to an ordinary invitee. Furstein v. Hill, 218 Conn. 610, 615, 590 A.2d 939 (1991). Thus, under the firefighter’s rule, the landowner generally owes the firefighter or police officer injured on his property “only the duty not to injure him wilfully or wantonly . . . .” Id., 616. The principal issue…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Krauth v. Israel Geller and Buckingham Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Berko v. FredaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. Kreski v. Modern Wholesale Electric Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Lodge v. Arett Sales Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Morin v. Bell Court Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Perez-Dickson v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  2. State v. CrawleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  3. Schemberg v. SmicherkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Sepega v. DeLaura ConcurrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  5. Justin LUND v. MILFORD HOSPITAL, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API