Legal Opinion
In re the Accounting of De Rosa
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided July 29, 1965PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Harry G. Herman, S.
This is an application to punish Berardino Mastromonaco for contempt for his refusal to answer certain questions propounded to him on his examination before trial (CPLR 2308, subd. [a]), or, in the alternative, to compel him to answer said questions (CPLR 3124).
This motion is brought by the examining party herein, who is the surviving widower of the testatrix; he had filed objections to the account of the executrix, a sister of the testatrix, on the ground that it failed to include as assets of the estate certain shares of stock alleged to have been owned by the testatrix…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Goldmark v. U. S. Electro-Galvanizing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Manufacturers Trust Co. v. American National Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Williams v. Sterling Estates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1963
- In re the Estate of MontgomeryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
- De Groote v. WegleinNew York Supreme Court · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Armentrout v. SchoolerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966