Legal Opinion

In re: Ford Motor Company

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 22, 2003No. 03-10440PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMONDSON, Chief Judge:

Appellant Ford Motor Company seeks a writ of mandamus or prohibition directing Chief Judge Clemon of the Northern District of Alabama to vacate a discovery order. The order required Ford to allow Plaintiff Elizabeth Russell access to Ford’s Master Owner Relations Systems I, II, and III (“MORS”) and Common Quality Indicator System (“CQIS”) databases.

Russell filed suit against Ford. The suit alleges that the seatbelt buckle of Russell’s Ford vehicle was defectively designed because the buckle “inertially unlatched” during an accident, causing her injury. After filing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. In Re Vicki Lopez-Lukis, Sylvester LukisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  3. In Re David Stuart Fink, M.D., David Stuart Fink, M.D., P.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. John B. v. GoetzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. In Re Weekley Homes, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Treppel v. Biovail Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  4. Kevin Danley v. Ruby AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  5. Carpenter v. Mohawk Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API