Legal Opinion
Gilbert Lau v. Mark M. Meddaugh
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 5, 2000No. 2000PublishedCited by 211 opinions
1Per curiam
Gilbert Lau, pro se, appeals from a sua sponte oral order entered by the United States District Court for the Southern Distinct of New York (McMahon, /.), enjoining him from filing in that district any action on the same underlying facts unless he first submits the complaint to a United States Magistrate Judge for vetting. Lau raised three other issues on appeal which we reject in an unpublished summary order also filed today. See Lau v. Med-daugh, No. 99-9363, 2000 WL 1476577 (2d Cir.2000). This opinion considers Lau’s claim that the district court violated his right to due process by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schmidt v. LessardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Robert Moates v. Wayne Barkley, Superintendent at Riverview Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Gunn v. University Committee to End the War in Viet NamSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Clarkson Co. v. ShaheenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Carole Heller Weitzman, as Assignee of Saul Weitzman v. Sidney Stein, Albert Feiffer and Norman Rubinson v. Beverly SteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by211 opinions
- City of New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Garcia v. Yonkers School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Liebowitz v. Bandshell Artist ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Floyd v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Caldwell v. PesceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
206 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.