Legal Opinion

In re Wieg

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided January 21, 1929No. 3391PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, District Judge.

In this ease the undisputed facts are:

Frank Wieg was bom in Germany, on September 24, 1889. In the early part of 1924 he applied to the American consul at Hamburg, Germany, for a quota immigration visa, with the intention of coming to the United States for the purpose of permanent residence. He was informed by the consul that no such visa could be issued to him at that time, inasmuch as the German quota was filled. Wieg then applied for a visa to permit him to enter the United States as a visitor. This visa was issued, and on March 10, 1924, he arrived at the port of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. NessSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. In Re JensenDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1926
  3. In re SchmidtDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1913
  4. Petition of ConnalDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1925
  5. In re McPheeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kristensen v. McGrath Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  2. United States v. ParisiDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1938
  3. Subhi Mustafa Sadi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  4. United States v. AnastasioDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API