People v. Banning Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEALS for judgments of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from orders refusing a new trial. Walter Bordwell Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, J. W. McKinley, Frank Karr, Ward Chapman, Sheldon Borden, Edward E. Bacon, W. R. Millar, and Lloyd W. Moultrie, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The appeals in these two cases are from the judgments and from orders denying motions for new trial in the respective cases.
The land involved is that known as tide land location No. 57, being the same location mentioned by that number in the opinion in People v. California Fish Co., L. A. No. 3060, ante, p. 576, [138 Pac. 79.] That opinion, with the exceptions hereafter noted, covers all the points of law involved in the present cases. The first payment upon this tide land location was made on March 5, 1880. The certificate was issued on April 10, 1880, and the patent was executed on December…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- San Pedro, L.A. & Salt Lake R.R. v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Pacific Coast Steamship Co. v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- City of Long Beach v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Atwood v. HammondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Newcomb v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Lee v. Indian Creek Drainage District Number One Etc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.