Legal Opinion

Cory v. Woodmen Accident Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1928No. 18965. Judgment reversedPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farmer

Defendant in error, Lamina Cory, the widow of Martin C. Cory, obtained a judgment in the circuit court of Pike county for $1000 and costs of suit against plaintiff in error, the Woodmen Accident Company, a corporation. An appeal was prosecuted to the Appellate Court for the Third District, where the judgment of the circuit court was affirmed. A writ of certiorari was granted by this court to the insurance company, and the cause is here for review.

The action in the circuit court was assumpsit upon an accident insurance policy issued by the company on June 3, 1912, to Martin C. Cory. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lovelace v. Travelers' Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Christ v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Hutton v. States Accident InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Union Casualty v. HarrollTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Prudential Casualty Co. v. CurryAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Yates v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Marsh v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Rodgers v. Reserve Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  4. Wylie v. Union Casualty & Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of Tennessee v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API