Legal Opinion

Liebert v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 12, 1969No. C.D. 3919; Protest No. 66/30765-25849Published

1Opinion of the Court

RAO, Chief Judge.

The merchandise involved in this case, imported from Canada and entered at the port of Blaine, Washington, is described as back v. roll assemblies. It was assessed with duty at 14 per centum ad valorem under item 674.53 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, as parts of machine tools, and is claimed to be dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem under item 674.55, as an accessory machine used with machine tools.

The pertinent provisions of said tariff schedules are as follows:

Work and tool holders and other parts cf. and accessories used principally with, machine tools; * *…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wico Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Engis Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Schick X-Ray Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API