Legal Opinion

Dion v. Drapeau

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 4, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaeeoll, J.

The plaintiff, a minor, was injured by the negligence of the defendant, while riding in an automobile owned and operated by the defendant. The report states that the defendant was "engaged in the taxi business.” The evidence introduced by the plaintiff tended to show that one Dore and his wife "were staying at the plaintiff’s home”; that Dore "hired the defendant to take him and the plaintiff and her family to the depot”; that while on this journey the defendant’s automobile collided with another automobile *187through the defendant’s negligence; and that after the accident the defendant refused…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Terminal Taxicab Co. v. KutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Massaletti v. FitzroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Black v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Wilton v. Middlesex RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Lockwood v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. First National Stores Inc. v. H. P. Welch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Steudle v. Yellow & Checker Cab & Transfer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Mt. Tom Motor Line, Inc. v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. Chaput v. LussierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
  5. Guinevan v. Checker Taxi Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API