Legal Opinion

In re Acquiring Title by The City of New York to Certain Lands & Premises Situated on the Northerly & Southerly Sides of East One Hundred & Twenty-fifth Street, between First Avenue & Second Avenue

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McLaughlin (Charles B.), J.

I know of no requirement that on a hearing of objections to the prehminary report in condemnation proceedings the stenographer must take down verbatim the argument of counsel or the observations of the court. There is plenty of power in the law to correct any mistakes, omissions, defects and irregularities, if any have been made. (Greater New York Charter, chap. 21, § 1440; Condemnation Law, § 12; Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 105-112.)

*261The trouble with this situation is that" there has been no mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable error, so, therefore, there is nothing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of ErlangerNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. In re City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1907
  3. In re of Armory BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. In re the Acquisition of Land by the City of UticaNew York Supreme Court · 1929
  5. In re Manhattan TerminalNew York Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Acquiring Title by The City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API