Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Kirkendall

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 28, 2007No. 03P-2418; A127290Published

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Wife appeals from a judgment of dissolution of marriage, assigning error to the trial court’s distribution of real and personal property. We review de novo but give deference to the trial court’s implied credibility findings. ORS 19.415(3); Lind and Lind, 207 Or App 56, 58, 139 P3d 1032 (2006). We affirm.

Husband and wife married on September 29, 2000. As the trial court observed, “during the period of the marital relationship there was cohabitation and extensive commingling of assets and activities between” husband and wife and wife’s mother and stepfather, the Laubes. At the time of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of KunzeOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In re the Marriage of LindCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. In re the Marriage of ShlitterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Hilterbrand v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. In re the Marriage of McInnisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API