Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rite Aid Corp. v. Bd. of Pharmacy of State of NJ

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 14, 1976No. Civ. A. 74-1628Published

1DissentStern, District Judge

While I agree with the result reached by the Court in Part II of its opinion, though for different reasons, I respectfully dissent from the opinion and judgment on the merits.

I

In my view the Court properly rejects the contention that it must stay its hand in this case. I write on this point only because of the Court’s analysis of the Younger-Huffman doctrine of federal non-intervention.

Defendants urge the Court to abstain from deciding this case on the basis of the doctrine of Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971), and its companion cases, that federal courts…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API