Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Small Business Administration v. Wideman

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 30, 1985No. Civ. No. 83-1865PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NEALON, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, Small Business Administration [SBA], filed this civil action December 29, 1983 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1345 against Defendants Edmund C. Wideman, Jr. and Edmund C. Wideman, III,1 alleging that defendants signed a guaranty agreement for a loan presently in default and that defendant-guarantors are liable for the outstanding balance.

By Order dated December 28, 1984, the court ordered the parties to file supplemental briefs to enable the court to resolve the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant Wideman, III filed a cross-motion for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Duke v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  2. United States v. HouffDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1962
  3. United States v. George H. ProctorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. Flasher Co. of TexasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1977
  5. United States v. SlezakDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Small Business Administration v. EdwardsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Forgione v. HirschhornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  3. Forgione, Anthony and Slushy, Inc. v. Hirschhorn (Seymour, Frieda)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. US ON BEHALF OF SMALL BUSINESS ADMIN. v. EdwardsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. United States v. On Behalf of Its Agency, Small Business Administration v. Wideman (Edmund C., Jr., Edmund C., Iii)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API