Legal Opinion

United States v. Houff

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided February 7, 1962No. Civ. A. 527PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHIE, District Judge.

This suit was instituted by the United! States of America to recover from the-original defendants, Louis B. Houff, Jr. and C. E. Keefer, now defendants and! third-party plaintiffs but hereinafter sometimes called the Guarantors, a balance due on a loan made by the Small Business Administration, hereinafter-called S. B. A., to Famous Virginia Foods Corporation, hereinafter called Famous-Foods, now bankrupt, and guaranteed by' the Guarantors.

The Guarantors were granted leave to> make the C. F. Sauer Company, a Virginia corporation, hereinafter called! Sauer, a third-party…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Duke v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  2. Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. McCormickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  3. Nashua Gummed & Coated Paper Co. v. Noyes Buick Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1945
  4. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. FaulknerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1958
  5. Hazle v. Southern Pac. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wallace G. Frederick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Johnny R. Austad and Dorothy Austad, His Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  3. Victory Highway Village, Inc. v. WeaverDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
  4. United States v. Vahlco Corporation, and Frederick Henry Vahlsing, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. Levy v. Runnells (In Re Landbank Equity Corp. )District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API