In Re the Marriage of Johnson
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray
¶ 1 Corliss J ohnson (Corliss) appeals from the Order entered by the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, denying her motion to enforce her Decree of Dissolution (Decree) by requiring Melvin Johnson (Melvin) to pay $7,192 as his share of their daughter’s medical related expenses. We affirm.
¶2 We restate the issues on appeal as follows:
¶3 1. Is the District Court’s finding that the Anasazi Foundation treatment does not qualify as a medical related expense contemplated by the Decree clearly erroneous?
¶4 2. Did the District Court err by failing to enter sufficient findings of fact to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johansen v. State, Dept. of Natural ResourcesMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Kovarik v. KovarikMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Marriage of Pfeifer v. PfeiferMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re the Marriage of LeeMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- Jones v. JonesMontana Supreme Court · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of DeistMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re the Marriage of JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1999