Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Deist

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 2003No. 02-646PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 The marriage between Appellant Lorney Jay Deist and Respondent Cynthia Wynn Deist was terminated by dissolution. Cynthia subsequently filed a motion for an order to show cause against Lorney in the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, asserting that Lorney should be held in contempt of court for failing to comply with the Dissolution Decree. The District Court found that Lorney failed to comply with the Dissolution Decree, but deferred determination of whether he was in contempt of court for sixty days. Lorney appeals. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.

¶2 We…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of KovashMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In Re the Marriage of SteinbeisserMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Kovarik v. KovarikMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Pedersen v. NordahlMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Filler v. Richland CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Montanans for Justice: Vote No on CI-98 Not in Montana: Citizens Against CI-97 & Property Owners Against I-154 v. State Ex Rel. McGrathMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Anderson v. StokesMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In re T.H.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Dollar Plus Stores, Inc. v. R-Montana Associates, L.P.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Wicklund v. SundheimMontana Supreme Court · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API