Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Surenko Realties, Inc.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided July 1, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRobert V. Santangelo, J.

This is a motion by the defendant appearing specially to vacate the service of the summons upon it and to dismiss the action upon the ground that the summons does not comply with the requirements of the New York City Civil Court Act and of the rules of this court. The plaintiff *1048served the usual Supreme Court summons accompanying the complaint, which directs the defendant “ to serve a copy of your answer, or, if the complaint is not served with this summons, to serve a notice of appearance, on the plaintiff’s attorney.” The 10-day provision for answering, found in subdivision (a) of section 29…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gribbon v. . FreelNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Hull v. Canandaigua Electric Light & RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Elder v. MorseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  4. Foster v. WoodNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1866
  5. Hober v. ReikertAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Malik v. CukrowskiCivil Court of the City of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API