Legal Opinion

Hober v. Reikert

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, second district, dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, J.

This action was brought against the defendant to recover for wages due the plaintiff, and ‘service of the summons was made on July 10, 1916. The summons when served was complete in all respects *638except that it did not comply with the provisions of section 19 of the Municipal Court Code, in that it did not have the plaintiff’s address indorsed thereon. The defendant not appearing upon the return day, judgment was taken against him by default. The judgment authorized the issuance of an execution against the person, and on July 28, 1916, he was arrested and confined in Ludlow Street jail. About…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stuyvesant v. . WeilNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Gribbon v. . FreelNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Hull v. Canandaigua Electric Light & RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. Mayerson v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  5. Van Wyck v. HardyNew York Court of Appeals · 1861

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. MartinCivil Court of the City of New York · 2005
  2. Steffens v. MartinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917
  3. Malik v. CukrowskiCivil Court of the City of New York · 1997
  4. Williamson v. Surenko Realties, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API