Legal Opinion

Pierce Oil Corporation v. Weinert

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1914No. Motion No. 3182PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Motion in the Supreme Court, by the Pierce Oil Corporation, for leave to file a petition for mandamus against Weinert, Secretary of State, requiring the issuance by him to relator of a permit to do business in Texas.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. 'Justice P.HILLIPS

delivered the opinion of the court.

The relator, Pierce Oil Corporation, is a Virginia corporation, chartered on June 21, 1913. It has heretofore made application in due form to the Secretary of State for a permit to do business in the State, tendering in that connection the anti-trust affidavit required by law, and all lawful fees. Upon his refusal to issue the permit, it has filed this motion for leave to file its petition for a mandamus to compel its issuance.

On. June 1, 1907, in a suit by the State in the District Court of Travis County, the Waters-Pierce Oil Company,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Taber v. Interstate Building & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Phillips v. PerueTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Stanard v. CantwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Levinson v. Montrose Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. In re PeopleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  5. State v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API