Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell, Hanshaw & Villamana, P.C. v. Pima County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ECKERSTROM, J.
¶ 1 Defendant/appellant Pima County appeals the trial court’s judgment awarding $130,743.60 in attorney fees and costs, plus interest, to the law firm of Waterfall, Eeo-nomidis, Caldwell, Hanshaw & Villamana, P.C. The trial court found the fees had been incurred pursuant to a contract in which the parties had agreed that the Waterfall firm would provide legal representation for a Pima County prosecutor who had been formally charged with ethical violations by the State Bar of Arizona. The trial court conducted a bench trial and, after taking the matter under advisement,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Valley Medical Specialists v. FarberArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Brooks v. Valley National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Bike Fashion Corp. v. KramerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.