Legal Opinion

Waterfall, Economidis, Caldwell, Hanshaw & Villamana, P.C. v. Pima County

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 8, 2004No. 2 CA-CV 2003-0069Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, J.

¶ 1 Defendant/appellant Pima County appeals the trial court’s judgment awarding $130,743.60 in attorney fees and costs, plus interest, to the law firm of Waterfall, Eeo-nomidis, Caldwell, Hanshaw & Villamana, P.C. The trial court found the fees had been incurred pursuant to a contract in which the parties had agreed that the Waterfall firm would provide legal representation for a Pima County prosecutor who had been formally charged with ethical violations by the State Bar of Arizona. The trial court conducted a bench trial and, after taking the matter under advisement,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Valley Medical Specialists v. FarberArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Brooks v. Valley National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Bike Fashion Corp. v. KramerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API