Rojas & Conner v. Seeger
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish ,of Orleans; George Henry Théard, Judge. Action by Rojas & Conner against Gustave-Seeger and Edward Claudel. Judgment for plaintiff against both defendants, and dismissing the call in warranty made by defendant Claudel on his codefendant, Seeger, and both defendants appeal, and Claudel also appeals from the judgment dismissing his call in warranty.
1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.
Plaintiffs and appellees have, fuled the clerk of this court to show cause why he should not issue a certificate that the record has not been brought up by Gus-tave Seeger, one of the appellants.
The response is that the record has been brought up, and that appellees’ remedy, if any, is by motion to dismiss.
Both defendants appealed from the judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. Claudel also appealed from the judgment .overruling his call in warranty against Seeger, his code-fendant. Claudel filed one transcript covering both of his appeals. The appeal on the call in warranty does'not concern…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Succession of TouzanneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gulf Refining Co. of Louisiana v. GlassellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Cook v. Ruston Oil Mills & Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Gardner v. O'KeefeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Richardson v. CobbSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
- Young v. Carnahan CreameryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.