Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Deutch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1934PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event, on the ground that the question of defendants’ negligence was one of fact to be determined by the jury by reasonable inferences drawn from the evidence, and on the authority of Hughes v. Borden’s Farm Products Company, Inc. (252 N. Y. 532); Jensen v. Great A. & P. Tea Co. (240 App. Div. 1008); Keegan v. Hohorst (235 id. 871); Ellis v. Friedlander (198 id. 57); Graham v. Bauland Co. (97 id. 141); Shaw v. Webber (79 Hun, 307; affd., 151 N. Y. 655). Young, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shaw v. WebberNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hughes v. Borden's Farm Products Company, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Jensen v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cameron v. H. C. Bohack Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  2. Simpson v. DuffyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. Hammond-Warner v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
  4. Ratering v. MeleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  5. Bravado v. MurrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API