Blue Line Coal Co., Inc. v. Equibank
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LUDWIG, District Judge.
Defendants Equibank, William M. Dens-more and John A. Kincaid, Jr. move for summary judgment. 1 Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c).
I
The amended complaint sets forth violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968, together with pendent state law counts for breach of contract, interference with prospective contractual relations, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty. Jurisdiction is RICO and federal question. 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c); 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
As set forth in memorandum dated June 9, 1989, 2 the trial issues were bifurcated. See…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hodge v. McGowanDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1993
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. PantDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1994