Legal Opinion

In re Roellich

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 26, 1915No. 3157PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Bankruptcy. Proceeding against one Roellich. On motion to review an order of the referee denying the petitions of certain creditors for goods claimed to have been delivered to the bankrupt on consignment.

1Opinion of the Court

BEAN, District Judge.

This matter was submitted on a motion to review an order of the referee in bankruptcy denying the petitions of Mitchell, Lewis & Staver Company and the Studebaker Company for reclamation of certain goods, which they claimed to have delivered to the bankrupt on consignment. The question involves the construction of the contracts between the petitioners and the bankrupt.

The Mitchell, Lewis & Staver Company contract is probably the strongest in favor of the petitioners’ claims, and presents the question for decision more distinctly than the other. By its terms the Mitchell,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Rasmussen's EstateDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reliance Shoe Co. v. ManlyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
  2. In re ThomasDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API