Legal Opinion
Honeywell International, Inc. v. Universal Avionics Systems Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided May 30, 2003No. C.A.02-359-MPTPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a patent infringement case involving technology in the aviation industry. Initially plaintiffs, Honeywell International Inc. and Honeywell Intellectual Properties Inc. (“Honeywell”) filed suit against four defendants 1 in May 2002, alleging infringement of five patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 5,839,080 (“the ’080 patent”), 6,219,-592 (“the ’592 patent”), 6,122,570 (“the ’570 patent”), 6,138,060 (“the ’060 patent”), and 6,092,009 (“the ’009 patent”). Subsequently, Honeywell dismissed two of the original defendants and now…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Renishaw Plc v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni and Marposs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Ccs Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation and Its Division Life FitnessCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Sage Products, Inc. v. Devon Industries, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Honeywell International Inc. v. Universal Avionics Systems Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Exergen Corp. v. Kids-Med, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- Maxell Ltd. v. Huawei Device U.S. Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2018