Legal Opinion
Maxell Ltd. v. Huawei Device U.S. Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided January 31, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:16–CV–00178–RWS; CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:16–CV–00179–RWSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
*677On November 29, 2017, the Court held an oral hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms of the patents-in-suit. Having considered the parties claim-construction briefing and based on the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence, the Court construes the disputed terms in this Memorandum and Order as detailed below. See Phillips v. AWH Corp. , 415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005) ; Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. , --- U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 831, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2015).
BACKGROUND
On November 18, 2016, Plaintiff Maxell,…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Magnolia Medical Technologies, Inc. v. Kurin, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- Sysmex Corporation v. Beckman Coulter, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2021