Legal Opinion

Martin v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 11, 1932PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAGLAND, J. —

This is an action under the Employers’ Liability Act to recover damages sustained by plaintiff while employed by defendant as locomotive engineer on one of its interstate freight trains running between Amory, Mississippi, and Memphis, Tennessee. As the facts are set forth somewhat at length in the opinion handed down on a former appeal in this case (Martin v. Railway, 323 Mo. 450), we shall only epitomize them here.

The freight train in question was being drawn by tw’o locomotives, both at the head of the train. Plaintiff was the engineer on the second. At a point on defendant’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. O'Donnell v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. Dietzman v. St. Louis Screw Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  4. Martin v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rouchene v. Gamble Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. Larey v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Morris v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. Elgin v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  5. Stoutimore v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API