Legal Opinion
Clark Davis v. Dan M. Reynolds, Warden and Robert H. Henry, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 30, 1989No. 88-1673PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Clark A. Davis appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He contends that the state trial court improperly excluded the general public and the press from his trial during a complaining witness’s testimony, thereby violating his Sixth Amendment right to a public trial. That argument was presented to and rejected by the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals, which affirmed Davis’ conviction in the state district court. Davis v. State, 728 P.2d 846 (Okla.Crim.App.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 916, 107 S.Ct. 3189,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Sheldon Sanders v. John Ratelle, Warden Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Ernest Sutton Bell v. Mack Jarvis Robert SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Kathleen A. Braun v. Barbara PowellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Ayala v. SpeckardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Zuhair I. Al-Smadi A/k/a, Sudgi AsadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.