Legal Opinion

Chester Rudnicki v. Issam Ateek

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 2016No. 328130Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS CHESTER RUDNICKI and SOPHIE RUDNICKI, UNPUBLISHED October 11, 2016 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v No. 328130 Macomb Circuit Court ISSAM ATEEK, SUHA ATEEK, VIRGINIA LC No. 2013-002760-CH SURLETTA, and CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS, Defendants, and RONALD E. REYNOLDS and VERCRUYSSE MURRAY, PC, Intervenors-Appellees. Before: SAAD, P.J., and JANSEN and M. J. KELLY, JJ. PER CURIAM. Plaintiffs, Chester and Sophie Rudnicki (collectively, the Rudnickis), appeal by right the trial court’s order granting the motion by intervenor, Vercruysse Murray, PC, to enforce its attorney’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of EdmondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Head v. Phillips Camper Sales & Rental, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Petterman v. Haverhill Farms, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Plunkett & Cooney, Pc v. Capitol Bancorp LtdMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API