Legal Opinion
United States v. Fullmer
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 14, 2009No. 06-4211, 06-4296, 06-4339, 06-4436, 06-4437, 06-4438, 06-4447PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FUENTES, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Darius Fullmer, Andrew Stepanian, Kevin Kjonaas, Joshua Harper, Lauren Gazzola, Jacob Conroy, and Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (“SHAC”) collectively challenge their convictions for conspiracy to violate the Animal Enterprise Protection Act (“AEPA”), 18 U.S.C. § 43 (2002). Notably, our interpretation of this statute is an issue of first impression in this, or any, circuit court of appeal.1
SHAC, Kjonaas, Gazzola, and Conroy also challenge their convictions for conspiracy to commit interstate stalking, as well as three substantive counts of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Maynard v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Terminiello v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. MarzzarellaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Drake v. FilkoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- United States v. BartonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- United States v. HuetCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Blum v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.